Global Mobility and Immigration Planning
Longer-horizon planning for internationally mobile families, where residence and nationality decisions interact with edu...
Citizenship & Residency Advisory · Dubai
Citizenship & residency
Assessment against published criteria, and preparation of the document set — the stage where most applications are actually won or lost.
Anyone approaching an application, and particularly clients with a circumstance that needs care: a name that appears differently across documents, a gap in employment history, a business sale, inherited funds, a prior visa refusal, or documents issued by a state with limited civil registration.
Also suitable for clients working with another advisor who want the file independently reviewed before it is lodged.
Most refusals and most delays trace back to documentation rather than substance. A file that is complete, internally consistent and properly legalised is the single biggest controllable factor in an application.
Eligibility assessment
Your circumstances tested against the published criteria of the specific programme: age, nationality, character and criminal record requirements, health declarations, source and provenance of funds, residence history, and the eligibility of each dependant you intend to include.
Where something in your history is likely to attract scrutiny, we would rather surface it now than have it surface during due diligence.
Documentation
Programmes differ substantially in what they require and in what form. Typically this involves civil documents, police certificates from every jurisdiction of residence over a defined period, evidence of the source and path of funds, professional and financial references, medical declarations, and proof of relationship for each dependant.
Each document then has its own requirements: which authority must issue it, how recently, whether it needs apostille or consular legalisation, whether a certified translation is required and by whom, and how long it remains valid. A document that is correct but expired at the point of submission is a refused or delayed file.
Source of funds
This is where files most often stall. Authorities increasingly expect a documented path, not a balance: where the money came from, how it was accumulated, and corroboration at each step. We identify what will need evidencing and in what form, early enough to obtain it.
Itemised criteria map for the specific programme
The published requirements, broken down.
Eligibility assessment for applicant and every dependant
Tested individually, since dependant rules differ.
Early identification of issues likely to attract scrutiny
Raised before cost is incurred rather than during due diligence.
Complete document schedule
Issuing authority, legalisation, translation and validity window for each item.
Source of funds evidencing plan
What needs documenting, in what form, to show the path rather than the balance.
Collection guidance
Including for jurisdictions with limited or difficult civil registration.
Consistency and completeness review before lodgement
Cross-checking names, dates and figures across the whole file.
Timelines differ by programme and by the authority reviewing the file. We do not publish indicative durations we cannot source.
Documentation, overwhelmingly. Inconsistent name spellings across documents, a police certificate from a jurisdiction the applicant forgot they lived in, a document that expired between collection and submission, or a source of funds narrative that cannot be corroborated at every step.
Not a bank balance. Authorities expect a documented path showing where the money originated and how it accumulated, corroborated at each stage — a business sale with contracts and tax filings, employment income with payslips, an inheritance with probate documents. We identify what will be needed early, because some of it takes months to obtain.
Not automatically, but it is material and must be disclosed where asked. Non-disclosure is far more damaging than the refusal itself. We will assess how it bears on the programmes you are considering.
Yes. An independent review before lodgement is often worthwhile, particularly where the file is complex or the stakes are high.
That depends on the programme: usually a certified translation, sometimes by a translator approved by the receiving authority, and often with the original apostilled or consularly legalised first. The order matters, and doing it in the wrong order means paying twice.
This page describes an advisory service. It is not legal, tax or immigration advice, and nothing here is an offer or a guarantee of any outcome. Green Apple Consultants is not a government body and does not grant citizenship, residence or any immigration status — every application is decided solely by the competent government authority.
Related
Longer-horizon planning for internationally mobile families, where residence and nationality decisions interact with edu...
Structured, sourced comparison of candidate programmes — with gaps shown as gaps rather than filled with estimates.
Who can be included, on what terms, and what happens to them later — the questions that usually decide which programme a...